International Journal of Research and Reports in Dentistry

Comparison of Four Diagnostic Methods for Locating MB2 Canals in Permanent Maxillary First Molars

Aashna Gill *

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Sciences & Research, Amritsar, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

---

Abstract

Context: Failure to locate and treat all root canals is a major cause of endodontic treatment failure. Various diagnostic methods are used to locate second mesiobuccal canal (MB2) canals, including direct visual inspection, loupe magnification, operative microscope, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Aims: This study compared the efficacy of four diagnostic methods for locating MB2 canals in extracted human permanent maxillary first molars: direct visual inspection, loupe magnification, operative microscope and CBCT.

Settings and Design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods and Materials: CBCT images of forty extracted human permanent maxillary first molars were obtained. Access cavities were prepared on the teeth and the floor of the pulp chamber was refined. The other 3 analyses (direct visual inspection, loupe with 2.5× magnification and 16× magnification microscope) were carried out.

Statistical Analysis Used: Cohen’s kappa and Cochran’s Q test were employed. A pair-wise comparison using McNemar test was done.

Results: CBCT was the most accurate method for detecting MB2 canals, with a sensitivity of 67.5%. The operative microscope and loupe magnification were also effective, with sensitivities of 62.5% and 52.5%, respectively. Direct visual inspection was the least accurate method, with a sensitivity of only 25%.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that CBCT is the most accurate diagnostic method for locating MB2 canals. However, the operative microscope and loupe magnification are also effective options, especially in cases where CBCT is not available.

Clinical Relevance: Choosing the most accurate diagnostic tool and knowing where to look for the extra mesiobuccal canal is the key to endodontic treatment success.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography, diagnosis, endodontics, root canal treatment

---

---

---

References

Harry H. Peeters, Ketut Suardita, Darmawan Setijanto. Prevalence of a second canal in the mesiobuccal root of permanent maxillary first molars from an Indonesian population Journal of Oral Science. 2011;53(4):489-494.

Verma P, Love RM. A micro CT study of the mesiobuccal root canal morphology of the maxillary first molar tooth Int Endod J. 2011;44(3):210-7

Weine FS, Hayami S, Hata G, Toda T. Canal configuration of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar of a Japanese sub-population. Int Endod J. 1999;32:79–87.

Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30: 391–8.

Kottoor J, Velmurugan S, Surendran S. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with eight root canal systems evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: A case report. J Endod. 2011;37:715-9

Pomeranz HH, Fishelberg G. The secondary mesiobuccal canal of maxillary molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1974;88:119-124.

Rouhani A, Bagherpour A, Akbari M, Azizi M, Nejat A, Naghavi N. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary first and second molars in Iranian population: A morphological study. Iran Endod J. 2014;9(3):190–194.

Silveira LFM, Marques MM, da Costa RK, Martos J, Lorenzi A. Location and negotiability of second mesiobuccal canal in upper molar by tomographic and anatomical macroscopic analysis. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35(9):791-5.

Ciobanu IE, Rusu D, Stratul SI, Didilescu AC, Cristache CM. Root canal stripping: Malpractice or common procedural accident—An ethical dilemma in endodontics. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2016;Article ID 4841090.

Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005;10(1):3-29

Taylor RMS. Variation in morphology of teeth: Anthropologic and forensic aspects. Springfield, Charles C. Thomas Publisher Ltd., 1978;1-40.

Alrahabi M, Sohail Zafar M. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2015;31(2):426-430.

Martins JNR, Moataz-Bellah. Worldwide analyses of maxillary first molar second mesiobuccal prevalence: A multicenter cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2018;44(11):1641-1649.e1.

Brown P, Herbranson E. Dental anatomy & 3D tooth atlas version 3.0. Carol Stream, IL, Quintessence, 2005;261-4.

Barbizam JVB, Ribeiro RG. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. Journal of Endodontia. 2004;30(9):668-671

Walton R, Torabinejad M. Principles and practice of endodontics, 2nd ed. Philadelphia:W.B. Saunders Co.; 1996.

Azhar Iqbal. The factors responsible for endodontic treatment failure in the permanent dentitions of the patients reported to the College of Dentistry, the University of Aljouf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10 (5):ZC146–ZC148

Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969; 28(3):419-25.

Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod. 1990;16:311–7.

Chang SW, Lee JK, Lee Y, Kum KY. In-depth morphological study of mesiobuccal root canal systems in maxillary first molars: review. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(1):2-10.

Chang SW, Lee JK, Lee Y, Kum KY. In-depth morphological study of mesiobuccal root canal systems in maxillary first molars: review. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(1):2-10.

Badole GP, Bahadure RN, Warhadpande MM, Kubde R. A rare root canal configuration of maxillary second molar: a case report. Case Rep Dent. 2012;2012:767582.

Stefano Corbella, Massimo Del Fabbro, Igor Tsesis, Silvio Taschieri. Computerized tomography technique for the investigation of the maxillary first molar mesiobuccal root. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:614898

Tian XM, Yang XW, Qian L, Wei B, Gong Y. Analysis of the root and canal morphologies in maxillary first and second molars in a Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography. Journal of Endodontia. 2016;42(5):696-701.

Seidberg BH, Altman M, Guttuso J, Suson M. Frequency of two mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary permanent first molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973;87:852–6.