The Evaluation of the Efficiency of LED Light-curing Units Used in Private Dental Clinics

Main Article Content

Nazanin Forghani


Background and Aim: The light-cured composites and other restorative materials are quite common in dentistry today. Successful restorations are dependent on the efficiency of the light-curing unit, the intensity of light, and its wavelength. This study evaluated the efficacy of LED light-curing units in private dental clinics in Tehran. 

Materials and Methods: In this descriptive cross-sectional study, 320 light-curing devices in different private dental clinics were randomly evaluated. The radiometer (light-testing-meter) measured Light intensity, and also dust on the fan and cracks or scratches on the filter were directly observed. Moreover, the age of the device, the frequency of changing the bulbs and satisfaction of the dentist concerning the light-curing unit were recorded in questionnaires. Data were analyzed for Spearman correlation and t-test using SPSS software with p<0.05 as the level of significance.

Results: The results showed that the intensity of 53.75% units was more than 300 mW/cm2. The power of 30.3% of curing light units was between 200 and 300 mW/cm2, and 15.9% had lower than200 mW/cm2. The light intensity has a negative relation with the age of the unit, frequency of bulb changing, and scratches on the filter and dust on the fan.

Conclusion: The results proved that the light intensity of about 46% of light-curing units, used in private dental practices and clinics, were inadequate. Since factors such as ageing of the light-curing devices, frequency of bulb replacement, increasing the amount of dust on the fan and scratches on the filter reduces the light intensity; therefore, regular quality control of these devices is necessary.

Light curing unit, intensity, radiometer, composite resin.

Article Details

How to Cite
Forghani, N. (2019). The Evaluation of the Efficiency of LED Light-curing Units Used in Private Dental Clinics. International Journal of Research and Reports in Dentistry, 2(2), 1-6. Retrieved from
Case Study


1. Lee YR, Ghani NRNA, Karobari MI, Noorani TY, Halim MS. Evaluation of light-curing units used in dental clinics at a University in Malaysia. Journal of Inter-national Oral Health. 2018;10(4):206.
2. Barghi N, Berry T, Hatton C. Evaluating intensity output of curing lights in private dental offices. Journal of the American Dental Association. 1994;125:992–6.
3. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW. Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. Am J Dent. 1993;6(2):91-5.
4. Dugan WT, Hartleb JH. The influence of a glutaraldehyde disinfecting solution on curing light effectiveness. Gen Dent. 1989; 37(1):40-3.
5. Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Rhodes B. Visible light-activated resins depth of cure. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;106(5):634-7.
6. Friedman J, Hassan R. Comparison study of visible curing lights and hardness of light-cured restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52(4):504-6.
7. Dunne SM, Davies BR, Millar BJ. A survey of the effectiveness of dental light- curing units and a comparison of light testing devices. Br Dent J 1996; 180(11):411-6.
8. Doloure Mesbah, Kiaie M. Evaluation of the performance of light-curing devices in private dental offices in Rasht. Number 1084. Dentistry. Faculty of Dentistry, Gilan University of Medical Sciences & Health Services; 2003.
9. Savadi Oskoee S, Poor Abbas R, Hafezehquran A. Evaluation of light-curing units effectiveness used in clinics and private dental offices of Tabriz, 2001. Journal of Dental School Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. 2004;22: 82–95.
10. Omidi BR, Gosili A, Jaber-Ansari M, Mahdkhah A. Intensity output and effectiveness of light-curing units in dental offices. Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. 2018;10(6):e555.
11. Akhavan Zanjani, Ghasemi A, Nosohi N. An investigation of the severity of light curing devices in Tehran offices in 1997. Journal of Dental Medicine, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. 2001;17-24:19.
12. EK Hansen E. Asmussen reliability of three dental radiometers. Scand J Dent Res. 1993;101:115-119.
13. Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK. Efficacy testing of visible-light-curing units. Oper Dent. 1994;19:47-52.
14. Pilo R, Oelgiesser D, Cardash HS. A survey of output intensity and potential for depth of cure among light-curing units in clinical use. J Dent. 1999;27:235-41.
15. Miyazaki M, Hattori T, Ichiishi Y, Kondo M, Onose H, Moore BK. The evaluation of curing units used in private dental offices. Operative Dentistry. 1998;23:50–4.
16. Hegde V, Jadhav S, Aher GB. A clinical survey of the output intensity of 200 light curing units in dental offices across Maharashtra. Journal of conservative dentistry: JCD. 2009;12:105–8.
17. Javaheri M, Ashreghi M. Evaluation of curing light intensity in private dental offices. The Journal of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. 2009;12:50–5.
18. Rahiotis C, Patsouri K, Silikas N, Kakaboura A. Curing efficiency of high-intensity light-emitting diode (LED) devices Journal of Oral Science. 2010;52(2):187-195.
19. Bansal R, Bansal M, Walia S, Bansal L, Singh K, Aggarwal R. Assessment of efficacy and maintenance of light-curing units in dental offices across Punjab: A clinical survey. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2019;11(1):42.
20. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on the cure of resin composite. Oper Dent. 1994;19(1):26-32.